MEAM Potential for Au-Si: Difference between revisions
| (19 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
MEAM Potential for Au-Si</STRONG></font></P> |
MEAM Potential for Au-Si</STRONG></font></P> |
||
<DIV> |
<DIV> |
||
<P ALIGN="CENTER"><STRONG>Adriano |
<P ALIGN="CENTER"><STRONG>Adriano Santana and Wei Cai</STRONG></P> |
||
</DIV> |
</DIV> |
||
<P ALIGN="CENTER"> Created Aug, 2015, Last modified Sep, 2015</P> |
<P ALIGN="CENTER"> Created Aug, 2015, Last modified Sep, 2015</P> |
||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
<math>\rho_0^{\rm Au}</math> = '''rozero''' will be important only for cross-potential. |
<math>\rho_0^{\rm Au}</math> = '''rozero''' will be important only for cross-potential. |
||
'''ibar''' is a setting used in the equation of state (EOS) |
'''ibar''' is a setting used in the equation of state (EOS). It selects the |
||
G(gamma) function in Eq (4) and (5) on the paper by BJ LEE: Phys. Rev. B 64, 184102 (2001) |
|||
While the functional form is quite different, the modulus is almost not affected by |
|||
<span style="background:yellow">'''Seunghwa: Can you explain what does ibar mean? For Au, ibar = 3, and for Si, ibar = 0.'''</span> |
|||
the choice of ibar. |
|||
===New 2nn MEAM Potential for Au=== |
===New 2nn MEAM Potential for Au=== |
||
We now explain |
We now explain the newer 2nn MEAM potential whose parameters are given by Lee, Shim and Baskes, Phys. Rev. B 68, 144112 (2003), and later modified by Ryu and Cai, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 22, 055401 (2010). |
||
The main parameters in the MEAM potential |
The main parameters in the MEAM potential are specified in the '''meamf''' file. (In MD++, this file is in the potentials/MEAMDATA folder.) The lines which correspond to 'AuBt' are given below. |
||
<math>\alpha_i</math> <math>\beta_i^{(0)}</math> <math>\beta_i^{(1)}</math> <math>\beta_i^{(2)}</math> <math>\beta_i^{(3)}</math> |
<math>\alpha_i</math> <math>\beta_i^{(0)}</math> <math>\beta_i^{(1)}</math> <math>\beta_i^{(2)}</math> <math>\beta_i^{(3)}</math> |
||
| Line 74: | Line 76: | ||
repuls(1,1) = 4.0 (<math>\lambda</math>) |
repuls(1,1) = 4.0 (<math>\lambda</math>) |
||
Cmin(1,1,1) = 0.8 (<math>C_{\rm min}</math>) |
Cmin(1,1,1) = 0.8 (<math>C_{\rm min}</math>) |
||
augt1 = 1 |
|||
Note that we label the atomic species of Au as 1. The variable <math>d = 0.05</math> is hard coded in '''meam_setup_done.F''' (when repuls < 5.0). |
Note that we label the atomic species of Au as 1. The variable <math>d = 0.05</math> is hard coded in '''meam_setup_done.F''' (when repuls < 5.0). |
||
| Line 123: | Line 126: | ||
Cmin(2,2,1) = 1.0 (<math>C_{\min}(2,2,1)</math>) |
Cmin(2,2,1) = 1.0 (<math>C_{\min}(2,2,1)</math>) |
||
Table 3 of Ryu and Cai (2010) gives <math>E_c (AuSi) = 4.155</math>. This value is related to delta(1,2) through |
Table 3 of Ryu and Cai (2010) gives <math>E_c ({\rm AuSi}) = 4.155</math>. This value is related to delta(1,2) through |
||
<math>E_c ({\rm AuSi}) = 0.5*[ E_c ({\rm Au}) + E_c({\rm Si}) ] - delta(1,2) = 0.5 * (3.93 + 4.63) - 0.125 = 4.155</math>. |
<math>E_c ({\rm AuSi}) = 0.5*[ E_c ({\rm Au}) + E_c({\rm Si}) ] - {\rm delta}(1,2) = 0.5 * (3.93 + 4.63) - 0.125 = 4.155</math>. |
||
<math>\rho_0^{\rm Si} / \rho_0^{\rm Au}</math> = 1.48 because of the <math>\rho_0^{\rm Si}</math> and <math>\rho_0^{\rm Au}</math> values specified above. |
<math>\rho_0^{\rm Si} / \rho_0^{\rm Au}</math> = 1.48 because of the <math>\rho_0^{\rm Si}</math> and <math>\rho_0^{\rm Au}</math> values specified above. |
||
Cmax = 2.8 is the default value. |
Cmax = 2.8 is the default value. |
||
==Benchmark in MD++== |
|||
Compile the code using the following command. |
|||
make meam-lammps build=R SYS=gpp |
|||
Use the following command to compute the equilibrium lattice constant and cohesive energy of pure Au (FCC). You can download the [[media:si-au.tcl.txt | si-au.tcl]] from the link. |
|||
bin/meam-lammps_gpp scripts/work/si_au/si_au_benchmark.tcl 1 |
|||
The results are |
|||
a0 = 4.07300759775 Angstrom |
|||
Ecoh = -3.92996804082 eV |
|||
Use the following command to compute the equilibrium lattice constant and cohesive energy of pure Si (DC). |
|||
bin/meam-lammps_gpp scripts/work/si_au/si_au_benchmark.tcl 0 |
|||
The results are |
|||
a0 = 5.43100051581 Angstrom |
|||
Ecoh = -4.63000000205 eV |
|||
Use the following command to compute the equilibrium lattice constant and cohesive energy of Au-Si (B1). |
|||
bin/meam-lammps_gpp scripts/work/si_au/si_au_benchmark.tcl 2 |
|||
The results are |
|||
a0 = 5.4 Angstrom |
|||
Ecoh = -4.155000000083061 eV |
|||
===Impurity energy=== |
|||
Use the following command to compute the impurity of a Au atom in Si DC lattice. |
|||
bin/meam-lammps_gpp scripts/work/si_au/si_au_benchmark.tcl 4 |
|||
The results depend slightly on the cell size |
|||
cell size, Eimp(eV) |
|||
3x3x3 3.914 |
|||
4x4x4 3.968 |
|||
5x5x5 3.987 |
|||
10x10x10 4.005 |
|||
20x20x20 4.008 |
|||
The result in the paper (S. Ryu and W.Cai JPCM 22 055401 (2010), Table 2, |
|||
is <math>E_2 = 3.968</math> (eV) for a Au atom in Si DC crystal. |
|||
So it seems that the result in JPCM (2010) corresponds to the 4x4x4 cell here. |
|||
Use the following command to compute the impurity of a Si atom in Au fcc lattice. |
|||
bin/meam-lammps_gpp scripts/work/si_au/si_au_benchmark.tcl 3 |
|||
cell size, Eimp(eV) |
|||
2x2x2 0.639 |
|||
3x3x3 0.660 |
|||
4x4x4 0.665 |
|||
5x5x5 0.667 |
|||
10x10x10 0.669 |
|||
20x20x20 0.669 |
|||
The result in the paper (S. Ryu and W.Cai JPCM 22 055401 (2010), Table 2, |
|||
is <math>E_1 = 0.636</math> (eV) for a Si atom in Au FCC crystal. |
|||
So it seems that for a Si in Au FCC crystal, the predicted results here using |
|||
the 2x2x2 cell corresponds to the value in JPCM (2010). |
|||
Latest revision as of 11:08, 4 December 2016
MEAM Potential for Au-Si
Adriano Santana and Wei Cai
Created Aug, 2015, Last modified Sep, 2015
This tutorial explains how to specify the parameters for the Au-Si MEAM potential in MD++. It starts with the parameters in pure Au and pure Si potentials, then talks about the Au-Si cross potential.
Potential for Pure Elements
Original MEAM Potential for Au
As an example, we first describe the original 'Au' potential whose parameters are given in M. I. Baskes, Phys. Rev. B 46, 2727 (1992).
The main parameters in the MEAM potential is specified in the meamf file. (In MD++, this file is in the potentials/MEAMDATA folder.) The lines correspond to 'Au' is given below. Most of these parameters correspond to Table III of Baskes PRB (1992), as shown below.
elt lat z ielement atwt alpha b0 b1 b2 b3 'Au' 'fcc' 12. 79 196.967 6.34090112 5.449 2.20 6 2.20
alat esub asub t0 t1 t2 t3 rozero ibar 4.07 3.93 1.04 1.0 1.58956328 1.50776392 2.60609758 1. 3
Note that the nearest neighbor distance = alat / .
= rozero will be important only for cross-potential.
ibar is a setting used in the equation of state (EOS). It selects the G(gamma) function in Eq (4) and (5) on the paper by BJ LEE: Phys. Rev. B 64, 184102 (2001)
While the functional form is quite different, the modulus is almost not affected by the choice of ibar.
New 2nn MEAM Potential for Au
We now explain the newer 2nn MEAM potential whose parameters are given by Lee, Shim and Baskes, Phys. Rev. B 68, 144112 (2003), and later modified by Ryu and Cai, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 22, 055401 (2010).
The main parameters in the MEAM potential are specified in the meamf file. (In MD++, this file is in the potentials/MEAMDATA folder.) The lines which correspond to 'AuBt' are given below.
elt lat z ielement atwt alpha b0 b1 b2 b3 'AuBt' 'fcc' 12. 79 196.967 6.59815965 5.77 2.20 6.0 2.20
alat esub asub t0 t1 t2 t3 rozero ibar 4.073 3.93 1.00 1.0 1.7 1.64 2.0 1. 3
Note that the nearest neighbor distance = alat / .
We can see that from 'Au' to 'AuBt', the following parameters are changed. The new parameters correspond to values given in Table I of Lee, Shim and Baskes, PRB (2003).
'Au' 6.34090112 5.449 1.04 1.58956328 1.50776392 2.60609758 'AuBt' 6.59815965 5.77 1.00 1.7 1.64 2.0
Note that in Table I of Lee et al. (2003), , while in the meamf file, t1 = 1.7. This is because of the augt1 parameter. In meam_setup_done.F, there is a line
t1_meam(:) = t1_meam(:) + augt1 * 3.d0/5.d0 * t3_meam(:)
This means that if augt1 = 1.0, then the true value of t1 is 1.7 + 0.6 * 2.0 = 2.9.
augt1 is specified in the AuSi2nn.meam file, as described below.
The AuSi2nn.meam file contains several lines that are relevant for the pure Au potential. The variables in Eq.(A.1) of Ryu and Cai JPCM (2010) are given in the parenthesis.
erose_form = 3 rc = 4.5 attrac(1,1) = -0.182 () repuls(1,1) = 4.0 () Cmin(1,1,1) = 0.8 () augt1 = 1
Note that we label the atomic species of Au as 1. The variable is hard coded in meam_setup_done.F (when repuls < 5.0).
MEAM Potential for Si
We use the 'Si4' potential whose parameters are originally given in M. I. Baskes, Phys. Rev. B 46, 2727 (1992), and later modified by Ryu and Cai, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 22, 055401 (2010).
The main parameters in the MEAM potential is specified in the meamf file. (In MD++, this file is in the potentials/MEAMDATA folder.) The lines correspond to 'Siz' is given below. Most of these parameters correspond to Table III of Baskes PRB (1992), as shown below.
elt lat z ielement atwt alpha b0 b1 b2 b3 'Si4' 'dia' 4. 14 28.086 4.87 4.4 5.5 5.5 5.5
alat esub asub t0 t1 t2 t3 rozero ibar 5.431 4.63 1. 1.0 3.13 4.47 -1.8 1.48 0
Note that the nearest neighbor distance = alat for the diamond cubic structure.
= rozero will be important only for cross-potential.
ibar is a setting used in the equation of state (EOS), and will be explained later.
The modification made in Ryu and Cai JPCM (2010) is specified in the AuSi2nn.meam file. The variables in Eq.(A.1) of Ryu and Cai JPCM (2010) are given in the parenthesis.
erose_form = 3 rc = 4.5 attrac(2,2) = -0.36 () repuls(2,2) = 16.0 () Cmin(2,2,2) = 1.85 ()
Note that we label the atomic species of Si as 2.
Cross Potential between Au and Si
The parameters for the cross potential are specified in AuSi2nn.meam file. The lines relevant for the cross potential (i.e. between species 1 and 2) are shown below. The values correspond to Table 3 of Ryu and Cai, J. Phys. Condens. Matter, 22, 055401 (2010).
re(1,2) = 2.700 () delta(1,2) = 0.125 (related to , see below) lattce(1,2) = b1 alpha(1,2) = 5.819 () attrac(1,2) = 0.0 repuls(1,2) = 0.26 () Cmin(1,1,2) = 1.9 () Cmin(1,2,1) = 0.95 () Cmin(1,2,2) = 1.85 () Cmin(2,2,1) = 1.0 ()
Table 3 of Ryu and Cai (2010) gives . This value is related to delta(1,2) through
.
= 1.48 because of the and values specified above.
Cmax = 2.8 is the default value.
Benchmark in MD++
Compile the code using the following command.
make meam-lammps build=R SYS=gpp
Use the following command to compute the equilibrium lattice constant and cohesive energy of pure Au (FCC). You can download the si-au.tcl from the link.
bin/meam-lammps_gpp scripts/work/si_au/si_au_benchmark.tcl 1
The results are
a0 = 4.07300759775 Angstrom Ecoh = -3.92996804082 eV
Use the following command to compute the equilibrium lattice constant and cohesive energy of pure Si (DC).
bin/meam-lammps_gpp scripts/work/si_au/si_au_benchmark.tcl 0
The results are
a0 = 5.43100051581 Angstrom Ecoh = -4.63000000205 eV
Use the following command to compute the equilibrium lattice constant and cohesive energy of Au-Si (B1).
bin/meam-lammps_gpp scripts/work/si_au/si_au_benchmark.tcl 2
The results are
a0 = 5.4 Angstrom Ecoh = -4.155000000083061 eV
Impurity energy
Use the following command to compute the impurity of a Au atom in Si DC lattice.
bin/meam-lammps_gpp scripts/work/si_au/si_au_benchmark.tcl 4
The results depend slightly on the cell size
cell size, Eimp(eV) 3x3x3 3.914 4x4x4 3.968 5x5x5 3.987 10x10x10 4.005 20x20x20 4.008
The result in the paper (S. Ryu and W.Cai JPCM 22 055401 (2010), Table 2, is (eV) for a Au atom in Si DC crystal. So it seems that the result in JPCM (2010) corresponds to the 4x4x4 cell here.
Use the following command to compute the impurity of a Si atom in Au fcc lattice.
bin/meam-lammps_gpp scripts/work/si_au/si_au_benchmark.tcl 3
cell size, Eimp(eV) 2x2x2 0.639 3x3x3 0.660 4x4x4 0.665 5x5x5 0.667 10x10x10 0.669 20x20x20 0.669
The result in the paper (S. Ryu and W.Cai JPCM 22 055401 (2010), Table 2, is (eV) for a Si atom in Au FCC crystal. So it seems that for a Si in Au FCC crystal, the predicted results here using the 2x2x2 cell corresponds to the value in JPCM (2010).