Computational XRD

Computational XRD

Making Nanoparticles

Here we give an example of how to generate nanoparticles with different dislocations. One may have to play around a bit with the directories to make sure that the files get opened and written to the correct places. A python version of the MD++ code is necessary. The relevant python files are:

generate_particles.py XRDsetup.py

and these can be run with the command: bin/eam generate_particles.py

Notable Parameters

# flag = 0 is no dislocations
# flag = 1 is only one dislocation
# flag = 2 is multiple randomly generated dislocations
flag = 0 
start = 40    # Radius of the nanoparticle
numDisls = 6  # if flag == 2, the number of dislocations

This generates a series of .cn, .cfg, and a file of atomic positions which will be read by the C++ code to calculate the Intensity.

Intensity Calculation in C++

First, make sure the required libraries are installed. The GSL, C++11, and OpenMP packages are required (the GSL library is for easily making histograms). The required files are the previous file of atomic positions and the attached C++ file:

Now we are ready to run

g++ -o XRD.exe XRD_OpenMP.cpp -lgsl -lgslcblas -lm -fopenmp -std=c++11

followed simply by

./XRD.exe

Parameters

flag = 0 
Radius = 40   

wavelength = 0.67 # the wavelength of the incident monochromatic X-ray beam
divs = 6          # the number of partial distance calculations to compute.
                  # this needs to be adjusted to larger values for large runs
                  # because of memory issues. If not set properly, the code will
                  # exit with a memory error.
num_bins = 5000   # the number of bins in the histogram per division
N = 1000          # the number of points for the Intensity and Q

I plan to run several different sizes and compare the time taken for this calculation for a fixed num_bins, divs, and N to access the scalability. Currently the code is highly un-optimized. This code should be re-written with dynamic arrays instead of vectors in order to become much more parallel.

Plotting and Interpolating

The next step is to read the file of Intensities and Q values into the python script attached. The Intensity and Q values that are either background before the first real Bragg peak or are small values past Q~20 are gotten rid of. The interpolation is only done on the largest 5-10 peaks. The number of peaks that can be reasonably interpolated decreases with increasing number of dislocations as the peaks broaden. The following file plots and interpolates the intensity and it should be run as:

python MD++_plot.py Radius flag cutoff

where Radius, flag, and cutoff are parameters. These are some important parameters to consider, especially in the interpolation.

Parameters

wavelength = 0.67
Radius = int(sys.argv[1])
flag = int(sys.argv[2])
cutoff = float(sys.argv[3])  # Bragg peaks with maximum below this cutoff will be ignored
tol = 0.1     # The Q range around which the program searches for a half-maximum.
              # This really doesn't need to be changed

Thus the cutoff must be chosen carefully if one wants to get the most number of peaks that have resolved half-widths. This gets more important with increased peak broadening.

CUDA Code

The code is obviously parallel. The next step is to re-write the code in CUDA to improve speed.