PARADISCYL:Cylinder-Benchmark2: Difference between revisions

From Micro and Nano Mechanics Group
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
Line 29: Line 29:


== Conclusion ==
== Conclusion ==
Based on the plot, we can see that <math>\sigma_{rr}\,\!</math> ,<math>\sigma_{r \theta}\,\!</math>, and <math>\sigma_{rz}\,\!</math> are zero on the surface.Therefore, the traction boundary condition is satisfied well.
From the plot, we can see that <math>\sigma_{rr}\,\!</math> ,<math>\sigma_{r \theta}\,\!</math>, and <math>\sigma_{rz}\,\!</math> are zero on the surface.Therefore, the traction boundary condition is satisfied well.


=== Input & plot files ===
=== Input & plot files ===

Latest revision as of 22:55, 18 June 2010

Benchmarks to check traction boundary condition on the surface

ILL RYU

May 1, 2010

From these benchmarks, we like to confirm if the zero traction boundary condition is satisfird on the surface, which means that the traction force should be zero on the cylinder boundary. To do that, two models are prepared , varying the geometry of dislocation loop, as following figures.

Model geometries

To satisfy traction zero boundary, we need to check if ,, and can be zero on the surface.


Total stress on the cylinder surface

Conclusion

From the plot, we can see that ,, and are zero on the surface.Therefore, the traction boundary condition is satisfied well.

Input & plot files

ParaDiS input
Matlab file for plot