PARADISCYL:Cylinder-Benchmark2: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with '=Benchmarks to check traction boundary condition on the surface= ==ILL RYU== ===May 1, 2010=== From these benchmarks, we like to confirm if the traction boundary condition holds…') |
|||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
== Conclusion == |
== Conclusion == |
||
Based on the plot, we can see that |
Based on the plot, we can see that <math>\sigma_{rr}\,\!</math> ,<math>\sigma_{r \theta}\,\!</math>, and <math>\sigma_{rz}\,\!</math> can be zero on the surface.Therefore, the traction boundary condition is satisfied well. |
||
=== Input & plot files === |
=== Input & plot files === |
||
Revision as of 06:03, 13 May 2010
Benchmarks to check traction boundary condition on the surface
ILL RYU
May 1, 2010
From these benchmarks, we like to confirm if the traction boundary condition holds on the surface, which means that the traction force should be zero on the cylinder boundary. To do that, two models are prepared , varying the geometry of dislocation loop, as following figures.
Model geometries
To satisfy traction zero boundary, we need to check if ,, and can be zero on the surface.
Total stress on the cylinder surface
Conclusion
Based on the plot, we can see that ,, and can be zero on the surface.Therefore, the traction boundary condition is satisfied well.