PARADISCYL:Cylinder-Benchmark2: Difference between revisions

From Micro and Nano Mechanics Group
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with '=Benchmarks to check traction boundary condition on the surface= ==ILL RYU== ===May 1, 2010=== From these benchmarks, we like to confirm if the traction boundary condition holds…')
 
Line 22: Line 22:


== Conclusion ==
== Conclusion ==
Based on the plot, we can see that The reason why <math>\sigma_{rr}\,\!</math> ,<math>\sigma_{r \theta}\,\!</math>, and <math>\sigma_{rz}\,\!</math> can be zero on the surface.Therefore, the traction boundary condition is satisfied well.
Based on the plot, we can see that <math>\sigma_{rr}\,\!</math> ,<math>\sigma_{r \theta}\,\!</math>, and <math>\sigma_{rz}\,\!</math> can be zero on the surface.Therefore, the traction boundary condition is satisfied well.


=== Input & plot files ===
=== Input & plot files ===

Revision as of 06:03, 13 May 2010

Benchmarks to check traction boundary condition on the surface

ILL RYU

May 1, 2010

From these benchmarks, we like to confirm if the traction boundary condition holds on the surface, which means that the traction force should be zero on the cylinder boundary. To do that, two models are prepared , varying the geometry of dislocation loop, as following figures.


Model geometries

To satisfy traction zero boundary, we need to check if ,, and can be zero on the surface.


Total stress on the cylinder surface

Conclusion

Based on the plot, we can see that ,, and can be zero on the surface.Therefore, the traction boundary condition is satisfied well.

Input & plot files

ParaDiS input
Matlab file for plot