<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>http://micro.stanford.edu/mediawiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=2D_Dislocation_Dynamics</id>
	<title>2D Dislocation Dynamics - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://micro.stanford.edu/mediawiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=2D_Dislocation_Dynamics"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://micro.stanford.edu/mediawiki/index.php?title=2D_Dislocation_Dynamics&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-07-05T13:05:29Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.39.7</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>http://micro.stanford.edu/mediawiki/index.php?title=2D_Dislocation_Dynamics&amp;diff=3701&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Wcash: New page: =Simulation and observation of dislocation pattern evolution in the early stages of fatigue in a copper single crystal= &#039;&#039;&#039;J. Yang, Y. Li, S. Li, C. Ma, G. Li&#039;&#039;&#039;  &#039;&#039;&#039;Materials Science &amp; En...</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://micro.stanford.edu/mediawiki/index.php?title=2D_Dislocation_Dynamics&amp;diff=3701&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2009-11-03T23:14:52Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;New page: =Simulation and observation of dislocation pattern evolution in the early stages of fatigue in a copper single crystal= &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;J. Yang, Y. Li, S. Li, C. Ma, G. Li&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;  &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Materials Science &amp;amp; En...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;=Simulation and observation of dislocation pattern evolution in the early stages of fatigue in a copper single crystal=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;J. Yang, Y. Li, S. Li, C. Ma, G. Li&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Materials Science &amp;amp; Engineering A, 2001&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*Experimental and numerical study of single-crystal copper oriented for single-slip under constant plastic strain amplitude of 2e-4 at a frequency of 0.2 Hz&lt;br /&gt;
*Only modeled parallel edge dislocations of magnitude +/- b&lt;br /&gt;
*Initially a random distribution of 20 + and 20 - dislocations&lt;br /&gt;
*Only consider multiplication; annihilation is ignored&lt;br /&gt;
*Climb and cross-slip are ignored&lt;br /&gt;
*simulation area of 3.6 x 3 &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mu m ^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; with PBCs in x&amp;amp;y&lt;br /&gt;
*using the typical singular elastic stress fields&lt;br /&gt;
**If distance between dislocations is &amp;lt;10b, a distance of 10b is used in the stress field calculation to avoid singularity since they don&amp;#039;t consider annihilation.&lt;br /&gt;
*Mobility: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v=v_o \left ( \frac{\tau}{\tau _o} \right ) ^m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*It appears that if they had an initial dislocation density on the order of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;10^{10} m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; that the dislocations would randomly arrange after cycling? If they used an initial density of $10^{12} m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the dislocation patterns would emerge - this is why they chose 40 initial dislocations.  (It&amp;#039;s hard to tell because this section was poorly written&lt;br /&gt;
*State they use triangular waveform, but appear to indicate it&amp;#039;s the applied shear stress. (confusing)&lt;br /&gt;
*During cyclic deformation the maximum stress increases until saturation at about 28 MPa.&lt;br /&gt;
*Only consider 5 values of resolved shear stress (10, 15, 20, 25, 28 MPa) to speed up calculations?&lt;br /&gt;
*If strain rate is &amp;lt;2e-4 when the resolved shear stress is 28 MPa, then dislocation multiplication occurs&lt;br /&gt;
**20 to 200 dislocations with an equal distribution of +/- b are added based on the how far below the predicted strain rate the simulation was. &lt;br /&gt;
**Makes no mention of where these new dislocations are located&lt;br /&gt;
*Dislocations initially pattern themselves into &amp;quot;matrix walls&amp;quot; (not the same as PSB walls), which become veins with continued cycling.&lt;br /&gt;
**vertical walls are comprised of dislocations with the same Burgers vector&lt;br /&gt;
**Dislcations of opposite sign form walls oriented at 45 degrees.&lt;br /&gt;
**Says this is an equilibrium distribution according to classical dislocation theory, but cites a Chinese book I can&amp;#039;t find.&lt;br /&gt;
*claim that cross-slip of screw dislocations is unimportant in the early stages of fatigue prior to PSB emergence.  &lt;br /&gt;
*claim that screw dislocations spanning the matrix walls cause them to fragment and form into veins.&lt;br /&gt;
**In the simulation they select 6-8 cutting positions randomly, but I can&amp;#039;t understand what they were doing because it is poorly written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Evolution of persistent slip bands and simulation of its stress field in a fatigued copper single crystal=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;J. Yang, Y. Li, Z. Cai, S. Li, C. Ma, E. Han, W. Ke&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Materials Science &amp;amp; Engineering A, 2003&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*claims to be a 3D &amp;quot;discrete dislocation method&amp;quot;, but the edge and screw dislocations are treated as perfectly straight&lt;br /&gt;
**Never clearly explained if they are using dynamics at all&lt;br /&gt;
**No mention of how their structures are generated and if they&amp;#039;re even stable&lt;br /&gt;
*constant plastic strain amplitude of 1e-3&lt;br /&gt;
*only edge dislocations of +/-b in the matrix veins and PSB walls; only screw dislocations in the channels&lt;br /&gt;
*equal distribution of left/right screw and +/- edge&lt;br /&gt;
*Simulate a volume of 6 x 5 x 4 &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mu m^3&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; with PBCs&lt;br /&gt;
*edge dislocations are distributed randomly in the veins/walls and screw dislocations were distributed randomly in the channels, &amp;quot;according to an actual experimental photograph&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*Edge dislocation density of ~3e14 and screw dislocation density on the order of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;10^12&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
*again using the singular elastic stress fields, but with a critical distance of 3b this time&lt;br /&gt;
*DD is used to calculate the internal stress distributions and FEM is used to calculate the external stress distributions&lt;br /&gt;
**In the FEM mesh the veins and walls has a yield stress of 100 MPa and a Young&amp;#039;s modulus of 110 GPa, while the matrix between veins has 60 MPa and a modulus of 108 GPa and the matrix between PSB walls is only 56 MPa and a modulus of 106 GPa.&lt;br /&gt;
**Claim PSB channels are softer due to vacancies&lt;br /&gt;
*&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Wcash</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>